Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Femicidal Mania Syndrome

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:38, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Femicidal Mania Syndrome

Femicidal Mania Syndrome (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

No references in the article, and (more importantly!) I couldn't find a single usage of the term on the Web. Probable hoax, particularly as a lot of the science is nonsense. Zetawoof(ζ) 04:37, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Delete Google turns five results, seems like a made up syndrome which violates the Wikipedia is not something you made up in class one day rule ++aviper2k7++ 04:42, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Note: That's five results for the words, but none at all for the phrase. Zetawoof(ζ) 04:48, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete as original research, possible hoax, mayby BJAODN worthy. --Jayron32 05:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - zero ghits. Blatant hoax. May be speedily deletable. MER-C 06:26, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete — Delete as a possible hoax. –- kungming·2 (Talk) 08:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Nashville Monkey 11:49, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete hoaxalicious. Danny Lilithborne 21:28, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, hoax. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:25, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, No evidence of it existing per google or journal searching through Lexis/Nexis and others, the basic error in nomenclature (A real syndrome would likely be "gynocidal") further leads me to believe it's a hoax as well. Wintermut3 06:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete, hoax, and if anyone doubts this they're probably suffering from Femicidal Mania Syndrome. SkierRMH,07:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  • point of order Just so you know skier, hoaxes are regretably not speediable, we just have to lodge our complaints here in AfD... Wintermut3 04:20, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. OR. WMMartin 16:37, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks! -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:38, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.