Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felbridge Lawn Tennis Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Coredesat 05:28, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Felbridge Lawn Tennis Club

Felbridge Lawn Tennis Club (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

a non-notable business. fails related notability guidelines 'en-mass. ^Law/_Disorder 06:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC) ^Law/_Disorder 06:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

• Game, set and match for delete WP:NOT#DIR: 6-0 WP:N: 6-1 WP:RS: 6-0 --victor falk 20:51, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep and expand/update. There is a load of Lawn Tennis Club articles in Wikipedia, so should all of these be thrown out, thereby alienating another segment of society. scope_creep 21:19, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
  • if they aren't notable, then yes, they should be "thrown out" until they are. so, why should we keep it? because other bad articles exist? ^Law/_Disorder 22:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
  • fyi, i found a few more and nominated... thanks for the tip. ^Law/_Disorder 02:14, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete, clearly non-notable. 30 ghits ("-wikipedia"), nothing even coming close to satisfying WP:N. Doctorfluffy 08:04, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Punkmorten 09:33, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails to even TRY and establish notability or present reference. Epthorn 18:41, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.