Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feigning interest

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was This is a fascinating article. A situation ripe for administrator discretion to overrule the debate and retain an immensely interestin....oh....whatever. DELETE. -Splashtalk 02:00, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Feigning interest

This isn't really an article. It's a few sentences of someone's opinion. Normally, I say "fix it" but I fail to see how a proper article could be written on this topic. It would either be opinion (forbidden by WP:NOR and WP:V) or maybe a definition at best. Friday (talk) 01:21, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. Personally this looks to be the most one could give on this article. It is more of a dictionary entry than encyclopedic. Das Nerd 01:23, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per nomination. Durova 01:41, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Flapdragon 02:14, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete or send to wiktionary--MONGO 02:40, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - agree with all of the above. Catamorphism 04:20, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Odd article. Long history. Could be part of a larger psych article but I'm not going to recommend merge, Bye. Herostratus 08:29, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. — Matt Crypto 09:23, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Sheep-delete--SockpuppetSamuelson 09:59, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
  • What an interesting article. Such fascinating content, and I'm delighted that somebody wrote it...ah, what the hell. Delete. Peeper 10:09, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge to Social skills. --StuffOfInterest 13:40, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete dicdef. Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 17:21, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - heh this was my 1st article. Pretty lame, tried to add content, just never worked. wiktionary it is. -Ravedave 23:11, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.