Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feel Tank Chicago

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Korath (Talk) 00:57, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Feel Tank Chicago

Soft advert for a blog. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 03:50, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep. This is a major project of one of University of Chicago's most prestigious English professors. With her help, and with her permission to incorporate a bit of her scholarly material into the article, I've cleaned it up heavily. Snowspinner 14:01, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, but with reservations. Article needs cleanup and expansion. Megan1967 06:29, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Only 41 Google hits. RickK 08:04, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
    • Academic projects are something of a blind spot in Google, being known about by a small community, but still being very notable. Snowspinner 14:01, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete until it establishes notability by hitting the news or the googles. Radiant! 08:55, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
    • It's primarily an academic project - this is unlikely to happen. Snowspinner 14:01, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
      • That is a good point, okay, let's keep it then. Radiant_* 09:07, Mar 17, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep major projects by prestigious English professors. Kappa 10:48, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Yes, keep, academentia gets the short end of the Googlestick. --iMb~Mw 14:09, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, academic project, referenced in the journal 'Critical Inquiry'. Not that I understand these arts people, and personally suspect they're blathering on pointlessly a great deal of the time, but still more influential than yet another character from a Japanese card game. Average Earthman 12:29, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep for reasons noted above. It's pretty gushy, though, and it would be nice to see some critical viewpoint applied by someone qualified to do so. Jgm 15:24, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.