Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feeder Gigs 1996

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 00:31, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Feeder Gigs 1996 and Feeder Gigs 1995

Whilst Feeder are a noticable band in the UK, storing information on all their gigs is going too far, IMO. No other band I can think of has such a record on Wiki, and I can see no good reason for there to be one. So for these reasons, I see this as non-encyclopaedic --Kel-nage 00:15, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Note: vfd for Feeder Gigs 1995 now redirects here. I can see no logic behind keeping them both --Kel-nage 00:19, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Gig schedules belong on overpriced T-shirts, not Wikipedia. Meelar (talk) 14:19, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Gigs from 10 years ago? Small notability problem. --Scimitar 15:36, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Well, to be fair, they haven't been notable in the US since 1995-1996. --Badlydrawnjeff 16:45, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • This isn't really about how notable the band are, more their gigs and when they were. I can't imagine anyone looking through this who didn't first look at a fansite. As I said originally, non-encyclopaedic. Kel-nage 18:03, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. — Phil Welch 00:12, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, unnecessary list really however if someone wants to create some kind of omnibus article about their gigs then I'd keep that. -- Lochaber 13:18, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.