Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fazle Imtiaz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Owen× ☎ 22:52, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fazle Imtiaz

Article about a real person that does not assert the importance of significance of its subject. Delete for the same reasons as Offtopic.com, the message board he administers. Fails the Google test, only results are related to OffTopic or are generally irrelevant. - N (talk) 09:37, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:40, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as CSD A7 - "He's a gigolo and a great lover of many young women around the world." A statement as this doesn't make him notable. JoJan 18:34, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
• fazle is a great man and his contributions to the internet is very important. his life story is very interesting and it deserves to be on wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sams0n (talk • contribs)
• Delete. The references to the subject being a gigolo are vandalism; he is apparently actually a web site owner. Judging his actual notability, Google search brings up 20,700 hits for his name, but only 28 of them are unique -- most of them are generated by the fact that every page of Offtopic.com says "OT is privately owned, operated and funded by Fazle Imtiaz. Copyright © 2000-2005, Fazle Imtiaz." Since his web site is not notable enough for an article, I doubt he personally is. --Metropolitan90 02:23, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 08:55, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as A7. Turnstep 21:20, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
• delete totally NN except for the claim that the subject has a 10" tadge, which is unverifyable Pete.Hurd 05:21, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. 69.81.252.232 02:10, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.