Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fated Souls

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, and I recommend somebody also nominate the media used for this article for deletion. Sandstein 20:14, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fated Souls

Fated Souls (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Self-published, fanfiction-like game. The article does not cite multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself. (Multiple independant published works refereing to this topic do not seem to exist.) The subject of the article does not seem to have won any awards. This article totally fails WP:WEB. Kunzite 19:18, 10 December 2006 (UTC)


  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Kunzite 19:18, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment this is not a japanese-related articles.--Ongep 07:52, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete fangame, the end (compounded by the fact that it takes place in the human wasteland known as GaiaOnline) Danny Lilithborne 00:40, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - there was a problem with the link to this discussion in the AfD template on the Fated Souls article (where the nominators reason for deletion instead of the link to this AfD discussion appeared). I have fixed it. --tgheretford (talk) 01:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Worthless roleplay topic on Gaia. I especially liked the part about the "private anime." Hilarious, guys. Moogy (talk) 23:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep -- This is honestly becoming a private anime. Creator-and-all is working with an anime source team to convert it to an anime. I felt it was only right to include it in some form or another. Is there something wrong against stating the truth behind a reasonable subject? Raftacon 01:21, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment "Truth" or "existence" is not a factor for inclusion in Wikipedia. You can read the inclusion criteria for this type of article here. I've not seen a "private anime" that meets Wikipedia notability inclusion criteria. It looks like any of 100 fanfiction products that I've seen and read over the internet. This one doesn't seem to meet the inclusion criteria either. When it gets animated and gets a national release, come back and see us. --Kunzite 01:43, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment -- If you say so, yet I do still believe this is a dire mistake. Raftacon 01:59, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and Moogy. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:33, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment IP User 24.6.15.30, who made one other minor edit in the past to this article, removed the AfD template from it today. I reverted the edit. MKoltnow 04:38, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
The same IP user (who has made grammatical changes to Raftacon's statements on this AFD), has also blanked this page multiple times. --Kunzite 04:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
IP blocked by another admin. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment -- Woah, what's been going on here, exactly? Raftacon 04:53, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.