Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatal/Fake
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. W.marsh 19:46, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fatal/Fake
AfDs for this article:
I like Fate/Stay Night and would really enjoy playing this game. However, as this article stands it is simply a game guide. Looking at the talk page, I found that someone else wanted to delete this almost a year ago. Anyways, Google search did not give any reliable independent review from Gamespot, IGN etc. The game is mentioned in downloads or forums though. --Lenticel (talk) 01:36, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete: Seems to be a non-notable minor game. Can't find any reviews either. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 04:40, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Articles die if they are deleted. JuJube 07:29, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Rewrite: deleting articles doesn't solve anything. Think about rewrite. Well, its much harder, than just huff something, but thats the way. We can't rely on that some computer magazines and stuff has or hasn't a review of a game. I know, that ,,no original research", but editor written reviews, with a neutral viewpoint is also a good solution, well, the writers of magazines do the same, don't they? --Drhlajos 12:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Comment If no reliable source feels that it's worth writing about the subject, then for our purposes, the subject is not worth writing about. We don't get to write our own material here. No original research is a wikipedia policy not just a phrase. Sheffield Steeltalkstalk 17:58, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. Even if I fix this article and make it a beautiful prose, it will still get deleted. The main problem here is notability not just poor writing. --Lenticel (talk) 08:45, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- Reply: I think, that the official website could be a reference, for some basic information, in case, that someone would like get basic infomation about the game (such as what is it, system requiments, or even playable characters). Well, it would really reduce the page, but it would contain verifiable information, with trustable references, and containing no original research. The website is japanese, but I hope, we have a japanese-speaking Wikipedian, who can help. What do you think?(rem: no, I won't give up)
- Reply. Hmmm... the official website only gives specs, FAQs and Download info. I'm ok if you or your Japanese-speaking friend can find independent (meaning the official website doesn't count) sources. However, this will not mean that the article will be saved as those independent sources must be scrutinized first by the community.--Lenticel (talk) 23:54, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- Comment If no reliable source feels that it's worth writing about the subject, then for our purposes, the subject is not worth writing about. We don't get to write our own material here. No original research is a wikipedia policy not just a phrase. Sheffield Steeltalkstalk 17:58, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
