Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fat bitch protector

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete · Katefan0(scribble) 21:56, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fat bitch protector

WP:NOR —encephalonεγκέφαλον 19:25, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

  • This is a terrible thing and should not be. Oh, and the article should be deleted also. Friday (talk) 19:39, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, lest people mistake Wikipedia for Urbandictionary. — mendel ☎ 19:43, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 19:53, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per nominator. Sliggy 19:55, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete: Offensive and lacking significant worth, importance or notability — Cory Maylett 20:01, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - original research, unreferenced - --Outlander 20:11, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - slang garbage Tracyt1800 20:59, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete This should be in one of those blue boxes already! I mean, what the hell? The title is proof enough that this does not belong here Molotov (talk) 21:40, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
    • Comment It is funny as hell, though - and true. Molotov (talk) 21:44, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
      • BJAODN per Karmafist. Molotov (talk) 22:16, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
    • I don't know that it's true. Can you suggest a criterion for speedy deletion? None seemed suitable to me.—encephalonεγκέφαλον21:51, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  • BJAODN This reminds me of that skit on The Dave Chappelle Show about "The Greatest Moments in Hookup History" when he technically had the 4 way. Karmafist 21:45, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, for obvious reasons. I don't believe it's a valid candidate for speedy deletion, however. --Ashenai 21:45, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Disgusting and eminently worthy of a delete.Vizjim 22:52, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  • BJAODN ♥purplefeltangel (talk) ♥ (Contributions) 01:24, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Strong delete. Offensive rubbish. --Daveb 09:42, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete "Will someone please think of the children?". Alf melmac 20:15, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Ridiculous, should be a speedy Batmanand 23:28, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.