Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fast Company (magazine)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 01:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fast Company (magazine)

Fast Company (magazine) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Propose Delete on grounds of spam and non-notability. --Gavin Collins 18:20, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Weak Keep - seems to me that the article is a little spammy in sections, the fact that "…Fast Company was sold to Gruner & Jahr USA, a division of media giant Bertelsmann, for $350 million…" means that it must have been notable to someone. Plm209 (talk • contribs • count) 18:26, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - created as part of a disambiguation, it has its own merits as an article. 227 NYT mentions. Several profiles. See: [1], [2], and [3] as examples. Jokestress 19:28, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - useful as part of disambiguation if nothing else, but also has some encyclopedic merit. Maintainerzero 20:04, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - notable publication. We even have an article on a parody of it! JavaTenor 23:01, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - this is a significant publication that should be covered by an article. -- DS1953 talk 23:35, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep Clearly notable and easily passes any number of standards. Eusebeus 00:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep - per above arguments. --JayJasper 14:06, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep - I'm surprised this article is as thin as it is, given the splash that this magazine made at its debut and the way it has shaken up business reporting. I am a long time subscriber, it is for sale in every airport bookshop I've seen, even the small ones, so its subscription numbers must be quite high, making it a very notable American business magazine. Scarykitty 14:16, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep per Scarykitty. --Djsasso 22:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.