Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fashionista

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep and transwiki. --Ezeu 19:39, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fashionista

This and two other related pages are vanity articles whose contents are either not noteworthy or unverified. Moreover, it is not even close to being in compliance with other wiki standards, such as external links, etc. Ehusman 02:03, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - to retain the concept of a fashionista, but delete everything except the first paragraph because the reference to Lisa Brooks is an advert and probably non-notable. - Richardcavell 02:39, 18 May 2006 (UTC) vote clarified; thanks to jbolden1517
• Delete the whole thing, as a dicdef. -- Grev 03:10, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep From google: Results 1 - 10 of about 1,560,000 for fashionistas [1]. I think that justifies an article. Lets give this time to mature. jbolden1517^Talk 03:44, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep but remove 70.112.46.50 (talk • contribs • count) Lisa Brooks edit.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  06:31, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep article per Richardcavell, as the concept is notable. Delete the ad-spam though. Rockpocket (talk) 06:32, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Ad-spam deleted. Keep the article itself, which is much more than a dic-def. Vizjim 08:52, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki to Wiktionary, it's a dicdef. Just zis Guy you know? 11:27, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as edited by Vizjim. Paddles 12:34, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Richardcavell. Bucketsofg✐ 14:19, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki as dict-def; there are no sources other than a link to the neologism's equivilent in Japan. -- Malber (talk • contribs) 16:32, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki as per JzG -- stubblyhead | ^T/_c 16:44, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep or Transwiki this could be an article with more sources otherwise, per JzG. Crazynas 17:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, notable concept. hateless 18:03, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep and Transwiki agreed its a dicdef, but could make an interesting article if its flushed out--Adrift* 18:50, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki per JzG. Beno1000 21:43, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Thetruthbelow^(talk) 23:19, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Merge anything worth keeping to Fashion. Ewlyahoocom 21:19, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki--Peta 05:32, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki/Delete - dicdef. —ERcheck @ 23:30, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.