Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farseer Macha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 12:37, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Farseer Macha

Contested prod: article about a Warhammer 40,000 character which does not meet the agreed notability guidelines. Original author is claiming non-notable articles do not harm Wikipedia, which is a long-running debate, but not one to be had by article creation. Pak21 06:36, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, fancruft? Royboycrashfan 06:39, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Not fancruft, just a a minor character within the Warhammer 40,000: Fire Warrior game. If this is included, we're going to end up with hundreds of articles about every single character who gets mentioned by name in any Warhammer 40,000 material. Cheers --Pak21 06:45, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Warhammer 40,000-related deletions. -- Pak21 07:52, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, I don't see any way how minor characters like this are notable. JIP | Talk 10:05, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Macha appears for about 1/4 to 1/3 of the game. There is an absolute minimum that can be written about the character at this point in time, not much more than is here. Also, the main character of the game, Gabriel Angelos, is only present as a section in the Blood Ravens article, as he has not yet had enough of an impact on the fictional universe (and thereby providing enough information to write about, to justify an article at this time. -- Saberwyn 11:24, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Dlyons493 Talk 13:42, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete cruft, nn, at best merge Celcius 13:57, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fancruft, nn. --Terence Ong 14:16, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as it stands, the article is pointless. Merge, Delete or Redirect --Charax 15:46, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and if anyone cares to, merge this information to Dawn of War.--Isotope23 17:15, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into DoW article. --Falcorian ^(talk) 18:39, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable character. Should be removed. It isn't fancruft, however, as we can still mention the character in the W40K: FW game article Localzuk ^(talk) 19:14, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 01:17, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.