Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FantasyQuest

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — TKD::Talk 14:58, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] FantasyQuest

FantasyQuest (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

It's not entirely clear from the article what sort of game this is, or what platforms it's available for, and I can find no information anywhere online to allow me to further expand the article. No sources given for any of the information provided. JavaTenor 07:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. Based on google searching, the games website appears to be [1], although that link is dead for me. In any event, it's a MUD, and most of those aren't near notable. Someguy1221 07:06, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete offers nothing notable. --Oscarthecat 08:25, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete NN. --Hornet35 12:54, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Does not assert notability in the slightest, Wikipedia is not a game guide, WP:OR, etc, etc. I'd say Speedy it, but I can't find a criteria that fits. --UsaSatsui 14:57, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - The article shows no notability of the game, nor shows information on the game (creator, year created, etc.). As well, the article appears as if the text is taken straight from some type of hand book or guide to the game, which may break copyright laws, but I can't confirm this. TheInfinityZero 15:16, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, totally not notable, unsourced. Realkyhick 17:32, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Archive.org suggests that [2] was for some online shop, so probably not the right website. Based on the article creation edit summary, "Barely any information on this game.. I have a lone copy of it on my computer, which is where I am getting this information" I'm prepared to believe this is not notable. Delete. DWaterson 23:10, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.