Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fanmail.biz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 22:52, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fanmail.biz

ATTENTION! If you came here because somebody asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a ballot, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus amongst Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. We have policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting heads. You can participate and give your opinion. Please sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing! Note: Comments made by suspected single purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username|UTC timestamp [optional]}}

Fanmail.biz (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Bump from speedy, article and talk page make assertions of notability and large userbase. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-15 10:30Z

• Delete - alexa = 115,076: [1]. Probably fails WP:WEB. MER-C 10:38, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - artice describes site with over 7,100 members, lists 91,500 addresses. One of the few free autograph collecting sites and it is by far the largest. Lutherjw 21:21, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Poor Alexa rank and few members, and more importantly, no references that confirm any notability. -- Kicking222 21:22, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - this is one of the biggest celebrity fanmail websites online, thousands are members in a great community where anyone can ask the moderators for help in collecting. It is totally free, a huge database of addresses is provided, and volunteers help out anyone in need.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.4.72.14 (talk • contribs) 15:19, December 15, 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - fails WP:WEB. Unimportant website. -IceCreamAntisocial 00:42, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - nothing external to the website suggests its notability, and the creator hasn't supplied anything other than internal numbers. Mytildebang 03:01, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:WEB and no verification of notability outside its own site. SkierRMH,07:30, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Popular website. Contains thousands of feedbacks posted by fans and autograph collectors. Example —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.67.37.29 (talk)
• Keep - Great website with tons of members and lots of good info. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.144.78.229 (talk) 20:44, 16 December 2006 (UTC).
• Keep - Offers plenty of high quality FREE! information on collecting autographs. The vast majority of similar sites now charge, but this one does not. PeterCarrig 18:17, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - High quality useful website which is well reknowned for its reliable address information for celebs. Is mentioned frequently in the media, most recently in the Boston Globe newspaper. TheCollector 18:27, 22 December 2006 (UTC) No such user; this comment by 86.130.20.202 (talk · contribs)
• Delete, no third party sources, no reliable sources, hell, no sources at all. Sandstein 21:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.