Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fanart Central

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Dakota 02:52, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fanart Central

Not-notable, does not seem to meet WP:WEB guideline. Thanks/wangi 00:53, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

• Weak keep. Technically you're right, but there does seem to be a sufficient relevance to an online art community that it will become technically notable in the future. I have not checked the site or article carefully, but this is not an open-and-shut case. 129.98.212.164 02:24, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

• Comment If it will become notable in the future, we can take a look at it again and recreate it. Right now, no. None of the content is verifiable through third party sources. Delete. ColourBurst 04:41, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. The site itself is filled with the sort of run-of-the-mill anime that every 10th grader is tossing off these days, and it isn't even that busy of a site (2 years, and the top message forum only has 48K posts). Johnbrownsbody 02:55, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Delete. 54,600 google hits, an alexa rank of 26,570, but fails WP:WEB. Ultra-Loser ^{Talk | BT sites} 05:31, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete I've heard of it, and it's reasonably popular. The article also avoids many of the common problems with online-community articles, such as thankfully not listing every admin, banned user, forum drama, every time the servers went down, etc. But the only reference is a thread on its own forum, so verification with reliable sources would be a problem. Delete unless some strong reliable sources are found. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:43, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete, per Starblind. I've contributed much to that article (and as a user of said site, am well aware of NPOV policy), and agree on the reasons given. My vote probably does not constitute a WP:CSD A7 though. --Stratadrake 00:49, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: AFD consensus on this matter should probably be extended to the redirect page Fanart Cenral as well. --Stratadrake 00:49, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.