Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fan-Centric

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:19, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fan-Centric

Fan-Centric (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Unreferenced, original research, dicdef. Alksub 05:40, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete It is impossible to verify the contents of this article. A quick google search shows up no reliable hits for this subject as well. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 05:54, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Although the search results for "Fancentric" reveal a couple of sites ((e.g. GoNintendo or this) that use the term, the article still reads like a dictionary definition, and violates WP:DICDEF.--Alasdair 06:34, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete No verifiable references; violates WP:DICDEF and possibly WP:NOT#OR. →DancingPenguin 07:34, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - We know what Foo-centric means. SolidPlaid 08:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete dicdef, and a fairly innacurate one at that. A look at the original version shows it was written as spam for an "email marketer", but the spam links have since been removed. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.