Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Famous sites in Delhi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Neil ☎ 15:56, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Famous sites in Delhi

Famous sites in Delhi (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Nomed for deletion as per WP:OR. Most of the details are already present in Tourism in Delhi. There is no need of another article for "famous" sites. -- ¿Amar៛^{Talk to me/My edits} 11:14, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- ¿Amar៛^{Talk to me/My edits} 11:16, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete or Move to List of famous sites in Delhi as List of buildings, sites, and monuments in New York City. I agree that the article on tourism basically covers the same things, but if appropriately expanded, it should be much more than just an extended list. That would then render the current article more distinct. Joshdboz (talk) 12:48, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Rename to List of... The list is an access to geography articles. Tourism in Delhi looks like, and I would expect to be, a traveler's guide. Fame and touristic aren't the same.--12.72.149.119 (talk) 15:11, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

• I would oppose any use of the word "famous" in an article's title because that is a very subjective term. In which case, the article could be renamed to List of tourist sites in Delhi. However, if the tourist attractions are to be listed in this new list article, I dont know what use would be Category:Visitor_attractions in Delhi and Tourism in Delhi. Lets not have multiple locations in Wiki that are essentially saying the same thing. Thanks -- ¿Amar៛^{Talk to me/My edits} 16:31, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete: Tourism in Delhi is already there. KnowledgeHegemony 10:40, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
• I'd favor restructuring this list under a list of criteria that explains why each of these buildings is famous or notable. Tourist attractions in Delhi explains the top several sites, though, so maybe Famous sites in Delhi is too broad a criteria. Maybe List of gardens in Delhi, List of notable temples in Delhi, and/or List of parks in Delhi would be a better way to organize this information. Historic sites may be notable without being a major tourist attraction. (For example, the Pillsbury "A" Mill in Minneapolis is a National Historic Landmark, but it's generally not visited by tourists.) --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 01:44, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. The Category:Visitor attractions in Delhi does the job well. Tourism in Delhi is already present. utcursch | talk 11:23, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.