Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Famous Buses

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--JForget 01:09, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Famous Buses

Famous Buses (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:11, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete This article isn't encyclopedic and it would be hard to bring it to a notable state. Icestorm815 18:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Indiscriminate list of loosely associated topics. And the list of "Films Featuring Buses" is meaningless, because the creator has just done an IMDb title search for "bus", so you get Sudden Shock! Monster Bus (does that even exist ?), but no mention of Summer Holiday or Speed. Crazysuit 18:46, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - agree with nom. Nuke it. --BlindEagle^{talk~contribs} 18:49, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Listcruft. Even though it was the most important list I have ever seen, and I will miss it dearly, it make no meaningful contributions to the project. It would make a cool username, though. Or maybe a book.--12 Noon 18:58, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. This idea could have made a really cool list, that I would have been really sad to delete. This particular list, though, doesn't really take advantage of its potential coolness, and so its status as an indiscriminate list of information that isn't of much real use is more clear. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:08, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
• A tad on the indiscriminate information side, unfortunately, but as FisherQueen notes, it's entirely possible the topic could be turned into something worthwhile at some point (if we're not shooting "popular culture" articles on sight these days). Delete Tony Fox (arf!) 20:25, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, this list was ill conceived from the get go. Burntsauce 21:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per WP:SNOW. Please read the "article" before calling me unreasonable. --Thinboy00 ^talk/_contribs 22:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete same problem we always have with lists. The inclusion criteria is to broad and totally undefined. Also I've been noticing this a lot lately, what is the point of of having a list of red links? Ridernyc 06:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.