Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family Friendly Gaming

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Deathphoenix ʕ 13:46, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Family Friendly Gaming

Article was originally speedied, then reposted, this was challenged. Seems to be a non-notable gaming magazine that was recently created. Yanksox 21:32, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

The fact that this gaming magazine is the only one of its kind makes it more notable than all the others. The fact that this video game magazine has brought new innovations to the world of journalism is also notable.—Preceding unsigned comment added by FFGaming (talk • contribs)

  • Comment You keep making these statement, but it would be very helpful if you can verify them. Yanksox 21:51, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

How would you like them to be verified? www.familyfriendlygaming.com has more than enough information on it. Which other gaming magazines distribute through not only hardcopy, but also PDF format online, and on CD? I don't know of any.

Where are the other Christian video game magazines? This again is the only one I know of.

The magazine was created in 2005, and has 5 issues already completed. Currently moving from quarterly to every two months. http://www.familyfriendlygaming.com/Store-front.html—Preceding unsigned comment added by FFGaming (talk • contribs)

  • Delete - non-notable. The JPStalk to me 21:59, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

What makes it notable in your humble opinions?

I see no backing for the opinion that it is not notable.—Preceding unsigned comment added by FFGaming (talk • contribs)

  • Comment: There is a lot of POV, and it has a low Google hit rate. The article is poorly written. It seems like pure advertising. Please sign your posts using ~~~~ The JPStalk to me 22:12, 2 June 2006 (UTC)


I will try and sign, but have not had much luck with that cliche aloof part of this site. 20K a month is a low Google hit rate? How many hits did EGM have in their first year? None, because the internet was not around as strong back then. Your kind of comments is why I consider this site to be combative in how their mods run things. Please point out how it is poorly written, aside from being revised so many times because the rejections kept changing. I am about ready to just completely ban this site from my memory.

FFGaming 22:15, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

  • CommentFFGaming, the google hit rate is different now because the web wasn't as large. It's like inflation, the cost of many things in 1850 is far different now. Yanksox 22:18, 2 June 2006 (UTC)


If that is ya'lls elitists attitudes then fine. I shake the dust of my cloak off on this site. FFGaming 22:24, 2 June 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.