The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep pending investigation of the unsupported allegation of copyright infringement. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 02:32, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
This article has a Copyright Violation notice on it that has not been fixed in almost two months. NicAgent 18:13, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Comment I was going to try to see what was not copyvio... but I found the site was in Chinese characters and didn't see where the copyvio came from from googling a few parts of it. grenグレン? 17:29, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.