Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fairmont Winnipeg
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 16:08, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fairmont Winnipeg
No notability, no encyclopaedic value. Pascal.Tesson 06:05, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable. It's either that or transwiki it, but we can't transwiki things to WikiTravel through AfD, so the decision is made. --Coredesat 07:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep this article. Though needing expansion, it is inline with other properties listed on the Fairmont wiki page. I think it could use a clean up to get it to at least those standards. Now as to whether the Fairmont page should have all its properties listed...that is open for discussion (i'm sure wiki doesn't list all the Holiday Inns in the world). So...keep if we are going to keep the Fairmont entry as is and label as needing expansion...otherwise delete ALL the Fairmont properties links and just highlight significant ones within the Fairmont article (like the Chateau Laurier in Ottawa) KsprayDad 07:08, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- Comment: note that I'm not proposing that we nuke everything that is related to Fairmont Hotels and Resorts which is a legitimate article. But that particular hotel does not have much claim to fame or importance of any kind, contrary to some other Fairmont properties that do have their own article. Pascal.Tesson 07:47, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Not quite sure I understand what you mean here - if not the Fairmont Hotels and Resorts article, which "Fairmont" article were you referring to? --DaveG12345 08:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, I guess my sentence is confusing. I meant something like the Fairmont Winnipeg is an uninteresting hotel belonging to the (mildly interesting) Fairmont Hotels and Resorts group. I'm proposing only to delete the first one. Pascal.Tesson 15:15, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Yep, me too. --DaveG12345 18:21, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, I guess my sentence is confusing. I meant something like the Fairmont Winnipeg is an uninteresting hotel belonging to the (mildly interesting) Fairmont Hotels and Resorts group. I'm proposing only to delete the first one. Pascal.Tesson 15:15, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Not quite sure I understand what you mean here - if not the Fairmont Hotels and Resorts article, which "Fairmont" article were you referring to? --DaveG12345 08:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: note that I'm not proposing that we nuke everything that is related to Fairmont Hotels and Resorts which is a legitimate article. But that particular hotel does not have much claim to fame or importance of any kind, contrary to some other Fairmont properties that do have their own article. Pascal.Tesson 07:47, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Coredesat --DaveG12345 08:42, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
