Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fair use day

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. FCYTravis 6 July 2005 01:41 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use day

Not notable. --W(t) 18:29, 2005 Jun 25 (UTC)

  • Keep --Not much of an article yet, but it's a real thing that deserves an entry. --Tysto 19:13, 2005 Jun 25 (UTC)
  • delete total 600 hits on google--Porturology 05:44, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    —Preceding unsigned comment added by Porturology (talk • contribs) 03:04, 2005 Jun 26
  • Delete You have to be kidding me. --Hottentot
  • Delete Not notable? Try crystal ball, vanity, soapbox, not notable, unverifiable future event. -- Jonel | Speak 05:12, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Can you believe someone went and read this one-word article and posted a spoken version? Unbelievable. — Phil Welch 14:10, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Comment - The edit summary for the spoken version is "(add spoken version. it is a test of recording, not an endorsement of this article.)" I still think a better article for testing could have been found... -- Jonel | Speak 18:41, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep I see nothing wrong with the idea. More people should take an interest in this issue
    • Unsigned comment by 68.53.45.0. User's 6th edit - 4 to sandboxes, 1 to Fair use adding the external link that used to be on Fair use day, then this VfD
  • Delete, not notable. Thue | talk 20:51, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, I see nothing to suggest that anything about it is more than 1-2 hops away from the creator of the website. The website's bulletin board has 41 posts total. ps. I hope you enjoyed my spoken version of the article, it is not my only attempt. ;-) DanielHolth | talk. Nothing wrong with the idea of course, I just think the article smells of self-promotion.
  • Speedy the article and the recording. — Chameleon 2 July 2005 14:13 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.