Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fahrenheit 9/11 controversy

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus · Katefan0^(scribble) 03:11, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fahrenheit_9/11_controversy

This Article doesn't inform about the controvery, it tries to convince the controversy is correct HisHighness420 18:40, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

• Keep but revert any POV involved in the article. Molotov (talk) 19:17, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. My personal preference would be to refer to controversies surrounding the film in the main article about it, ideally taking an NPOV and linking to the various protagonists' sites appropriately. I think it would be very difficult to "revert any POV", as has been suggested above, as so much of the article is cast in terms that are more "rhetorical" than "encyclopedic". I hadn't read this article until it came up as a "VfD", and my immediate impression was of "soapboxing". Wikipedia isn't a soapbox. WMMartin 19:27, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and Merge any NPOV and notable information with F 9/11 main article. --Quasipalm 20:05, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and Merge as per Quasipalm Vizjim 22:22, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and remove POV. Controversy section would be too long to put in main article. Andrew pmk | Talk 23:38, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and NPOV. Owen× ☎ 00:20, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and Merge as per Quasipalm. Why is it linked to the Bush Family category? Amram99 02:50, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete It's right wing junk HisHighness420 05:07, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

Merge in with Fahrenheit 9/11 entry. The regular Fahrenheit 9/11 entry just makes it appear as this was a highly-acclaimed 100% factual documentary and it doesn't really seem to mention how many of Moore's points in the movie are presented dubiously from less than credible sources with little to no context.

• Keep: I do not believe that the Fahrenheit 9/11 entry should become a point-by-point description of claims and counterclaims about the content of the movie. That content should remain here. -O^O

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.