Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Factions: Revenge of the Reich

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 21:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Factions: Revenge of the Reich

Factions: Revenge of the Reich (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No mention after a google search of title, only a few in passing mention of author. No references RT | Talk 21:02, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy delete (a I was in the process of tagging), no context, spam. User name of author closelymatches that of book's author. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 21:04, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

• • commentAlthough my name and that of the author are similar, it is but a coincidence, and there exists no blood relation between us, nor am I him.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Antcap (talk • contribs)
• Speedy Delete - few Ghits, no listing on Amazon, and one of the two articles by the same editor about the same subject. More a piece of publicity than a subject for an article. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 01:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Comment - It doesnt appear to be publicity to me. -Ravichandar 05:42, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete The article needs to be deleted as per WP:NOT#NOTABLE as a Google search has already been performed and no results have been returned -Ravichandar 05:42, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
• delete Non-notable book by non-notable author. No assertion of notability, therefore possibly eligible for CSD:A7. No evidence this book isn't vaporware. Argyriou (talk) 06:35, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - nothing but wikipedia returned from a google search. No reliable sources. Not even any unreliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 18:09, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
• Comment for the record, books are not speedy deletable as nn-notable--see WP:CSD. DGG (talk) 03:24, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

• when the heck did A7 get rewritten, and how did it end up so clunky? Argyriou (talk) 00:48, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.