Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faction Equinox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 16:33, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Faction Equinox

Faction Equinox (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Unreleased software with no assertion of notability. Even if this were released software, with no assertion of notability, we shouldn't keep this article. It's apparently in an alpha release with 30 people testing it. Hardly seems notable enough for an encyclopedia article. eaolson (talk) 04:13, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete this is an ad for a nn product. JJL (talk) 04:15, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 14:21, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete doesn't meet notability requirements, no onus against recreation if the finished project gets reliable coverage. Best of luck. Shell babelfish 14:34, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Do Not Delete This article should not be deleted. It has already been released but a new version is now under development. It has much more than 30 onlookers but that is all that Faction would accept to keep the exclusivity of the matter. This is not what so ever an ad and is not worded as such. Even if it wasn't released you let windows vista be published on wikipedia before it released as well as WINDOWS VIENNA WHICH U CURRENTLY HAVE UP - if that rule is even fit to apply windows vienna should be taken off wiki!!
  • Delete Even if WP:OTHERSTUFF was a valid reason to keep it (which it isn't), this article is not about the next operating system from a company with 80%+ of the global market--it's about an unreleased piece of software with a few dozen testers. Could be easily recreated when the software is actually released. - Dravecky (talk) 08:28, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete Little to no media coverage also means it is almost impossible to supply verifiable sources. --Sin Harvest (talk) 08:34, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Do Not Delete Just because its upcoming means nothing, I think we should give it a chance. We have a whole "Upcoming Software" catagory! The fact that its not released is not a valid reason/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.113.92.112 (talk) 18:21, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
  • A reading of WP:BALL indicates otherwise. Delete B.Wind (talk) 04:26, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.