Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabiola Gatti
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. -Splashtalk 21:38, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fabiola Gatti
This was originally a speedy candidate, but the person in question may be notable. 500+ Google hits, and fronts for a band. No opinion on the merits, just bringing this to a wider audience. Mackensen (talk) 16:00, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- I commented on the talk page about that. It's really a very tough call, but looking at the facts and when I can see from this article I belive it should be a keep, they seem to be a legitimate band. They have a decent list of songs, a strong following, I feel very mixed but it appears this should be a keep. Maybe it could be brought down or up later on, but I think this should stay up. Yanksox 16:07, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep just about. Needs to be better referenced. Tyrenius 18:37, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- keep please it is a legitimate band Yuckfoo 19:07, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:MUSIC and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. No success has been achieved; try again if success is found by the guidelines. Teke 23:16, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per TKEKE. Not notable artist. --Starionwolf 03:02, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep May not be "notable" to you, but apparently has a genuine following. Is success being featured on the cover of Playboy Latino? http://www.bastardly.com/archives/2005/10/07/the-sexy-fabiola-campomanes-in-latino-playboy/
- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.143.225.138 (talk • contribs) -- Mackensen (talk) 15:23, 26 May 2006 (UTC) (Interesting comment)
- Delete - not quite there in the notability department. Article needs sourcing and formatting, too. B.Wind 23:34, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.