Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FS Metta-Latvijas Universitāte Rīga
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. - Caknuck 01:46, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] FS Metta-Latvijas Universitāte Rīga
non notable football team [1] Ojxn 16:17, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. 2° division national leagues and their teams seem to be notable on wikipedia, see Serie B, Segunda División, and 2. Fußball-Bundesliga. Mystache 18:16, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - not a 2nd division team but a top flight team now having just clinched promotion. Definitely passes. — iridescenti (talk to me!) 19:05, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- FS Metta-Latvijas Universitāte Rīga is one of Latvian football team. I had see so many articles, what looks like this. I adding information about all Latvian football teams. I want know, what in the concrete is wrong and than I try to redeem an error. Treisijs
- Comment Treisijs, what you're doing is completely correct — all the 1 Līga teams ought to have their own article, and all the 2 Līga teams that are professional (all the players are paid rather than playing for nothing). This should never have been nominated for deletion — iridescenti (talk to me!) 16:23, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- When I get information than I try to add it in those unaccomplished articles about Latvian football. Treisijs
- Strong Keep, professional teams are notable. Incidentally, the deletion tag on this page was broken at some point, the link to 'this article's entry' doesn't lead here. Can someone fix that? --Darksun 17:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.