Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FSV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 14:56, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] FSV

Of the four articles that link to this page, three are misleading because they refer to TLAs differant than the redirect and fourth is just a listing of all possible TLAs. Osmodiar 11:11, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

• Keep — I've seen this particular TLA in use before; it also gets >4×10⁶ google hits. I added in several more common uses. :) — RJH 16:27, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I changed one of the 3 lists that link to this; the other two won't load but I'm sure they can be fixed easily. Not a reason for deletion. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-11 23:13Z
• Keep, it's quite all right. Stifle 18:30, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.