Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FP3 player
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. --MCB (talk) 07:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] FP3 player
...Is it worth having an article on this? This is how it looked when I tagged it for speedy deletion [1]. Then it went to this. Now, a week later, despite stub tags being added, it's still arguably non-notable.
This is my first time doing this [nominating an AfD] - make it special. Dlae│here 14:05, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Fixed malformed nomination (please use the {{afd2}} template). Find sources: FP3 player — news, books, scholar; there's one article from the New York Times [2]. Along with the CNet review, it might squeak by WP:N, though I'm not too sure. cab (talk) 14:13, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep A CNET review and NY Times article are enough for me, especially since it comes from such a major toy company. — brighterorange (talk) 15:22, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
-
- I improved the article a bit. — brighterorange (talk) 15:29, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, even with the item being mentioned once in the NY Times, it doesn't pass WP:N in my opinion. Poeloq (talk) 16:26, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep I'm seeing several news stories on this[3]; in addition to the ones mentioned above, there's the Newsweek piece, Arab News, International Herald Tribune, and others. --Fabrictramp (talk) 21:14, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- IHT one seems to be a reprint of the NYT; both start out "Shaped like a hockey puck and just about as indestructible, the Kid-Tough FP3 Player from Fisher-Price puts music and stories at children's fingertips". And both that and the Arab News report are pretty short; the Newsweek one is even shorter, just 3 lines in a 95-item list. cab (talk) 07:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - google news sites, such as New York Times, Arab News, and others establish that this passes WP:CORP. The Evil Spartan (talk) 02:15, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
