Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FITALY

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure). TN‑X-Man 01:04, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

FITALY (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

This article about a keyboard layout for mobile devices has been a stub for quite a while now. It doesn't cite any sources and the external links seem to be to blogs, everything2.com and other similar sites that don't seem to qualify as reliable sources. Vquex (talk) 18:51, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

• Keep, but improve with better sources. Certainly a widely used keyboard for handheld devices. --Dhartung | Talk 20:19, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

• Keep. The first link is to the manufacturer's site, which has a great deal of information on the system, which has several variations. Why the manufacturer would not be a reliable source about one of its own products I don't understand. One of the oldest forms, now freeware, for the Handspring, I sometimes use; I found it quite usable after about an hour of semi-attentive practice. htom (talk) 20:26, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

• Comment The manufacturer may provide verifiability, but it is not an independent source. On AFD we generally discuss whether a topic has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources that are credible and independent. --Dhartung | Talk 22:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

• Nomination withdrawn. Looks like it is notable after all. My bad. Vquex (talk) 22:56, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.