Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FARO Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, doesn't seem sufficiently notable as a corporation —αlεx•mullεr 20:28, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] FARO Technologies

FARO Technologies (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

I previously deleted this as db-spam, it's been recreated and now reads less like spam, but still doesn't demonstrate notability unless a precedent has been set that being listed on the Nasdaq is notable. ^Khukri 10:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Fails WP:CORP. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 10:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom. --Komrade Kiev (talk) 13:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom; tech businesses need to show fairly strong notability at the outset. They still refer to their products as solutions and make unreferenced claims that their products make it possible that production errors . . . can be detected much faster than with common quality assurance, so it still reads like spam to me. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep and clean up. Publically traded companies listed on NASDAQ are likely to be sufficiently notable. Plenty of good hits on Google News[1], including Forbes, CNNMoney, Fox Business etc. The promotional parts of the article need to be cleaned up, but the company meets CORP.--Kubigula (talk) 21:39, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.