Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FARASSOO International

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was (not-so) speedy delete as a re-creation of Farassoo (AfD discussion). —Cryptic (talk) 05:56, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] FARASSOO International

Merging of Sony and info about Farassoo. Farassoo is a real company, I guess, but the article is WP:BALLS and copyvio as is. Dunno what User:Kaskou's intent is. --Quarl 12:58, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete - It is copyright infringement from the website [1] and it is previously removed from FARASSOO. Should it not be a speedy delete? -localzuk 13:02, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
• Comment - I wasn't sure how much of it was copyvio. He was editing too fast. Most of the Sony stuff has been removed now. As of now it is mostly copyvio. I think Kaskou is just a newbie --Quarl 13:15, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

I will add a db-repost as it is a repost of a previously speedied page and is copyvio... -localzuk 13:17, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

User:Joshlk beat me to it. -localzuk 13:18, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

• I think we're dealing with an enthusiastic newbie. Asked the guy not to do the "adspeak" thing, but I guess he couldn't resist.  :) Restored page to my last edit if there are no objections. - Lucky 6.9 17:52, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: (1) pure ad in current form, (2) possible copyvio mentioned above, (3) removal of {{subst:afd1}} tag. Also delete pictures named "Notebook", "Case", etc from image system. They are copyvio as well. Pavel Vozenilek 09:24, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment re removing afd tag: it wasn't by Kaskou; User:Joshlk replaced afd with csd, which was replaced with pre-copyvio version that had no afd or csd tags. diff --Quarl 09:54, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
    • So w/o point (3) but still the same conclusion. Pavel Vozenilek 10:07, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
• Damn, I'm almost sorry I unblocked that user. I told him emphatically not to add copyvio'd material. What a freaking mess. I may have fixed it once, but I won't do it again. Delete and protect from recreation. - Lucky 6.9 05:50, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, copyvio with a ton of linkspam. It's not an encyclopedia article, it's just a copied and pasted ad from the company's website. - Bobet 12:11, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.