Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F90 (Gun)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:35, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] F90 (Gun)

F90 (Gun) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

If this exist, it is a non-notable ficitional Gundam weapon. The article states that "F90 is the more popular and well-known name of the gun Formula 90", but the linked article refers to Formula 90 as a mobile suit not a gun. The photo in the article is a airsoft version of the FN P90, which has nothing to do with Gundam. BlueAzure (talk) 17:20, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

But F90 search it on google is a gun which also appeared on a game PS2 :Socom 2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roaring Siren (talk • contribs) 17:27, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

• Weak delete - from what I've garnered from a search of the internet, there seems to be little to support that this weapon exists in anything but an in-game universe. Fritzpoll (talk) 18:33, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. —Quasirandom (talk) 21:57, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. No evidence of notability. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 22:47, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• delete I see no evidence of the extensive coverage in reliable secondary sources required to meed WP:V. Far from it in fact, very far. No sources. Pete.Hurd (talk) 01:35, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as spam. The F90 Gundam uses a beam rifle and has no relation to the P90 whatsoever. Jtrainor (talk) 19:36, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete totally OR, totally INCORRECT. seems to be just a poor joke. MythSearcher^talk 14:28, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete: No idea what this has to do with Gundam. Looks like just an actual real life weapon to me. Utter nonsense. --nyoro~! Highwind888 (talk) 01:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - asserts no notability whatsoever. Also, to the above, state which of the speedy deletion criteria you believe this article meets, as it is not warranted unless it does. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 05:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Reply I consider this as Pure vandalism and meets the CSD criteria. MythSearcher^talk 05:25, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.