Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F.E.D.S.

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. dbenbenn | talk 01:59, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] F.E.D.S.

Is this magazine widely known? [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 21:11, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC) Yes, this magazine is widely distributed and well-known in urban areas, especially on the East Coast. (Previous sentence was added but not signed by anonymous user 69.141.193.181 .) Barno 00:27, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• I'm going for delete--ZayZayEM 11:13, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete--User:Boothy443 | comhrÚ 23:24, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, article does not establish notability, magazine advertisement. Megan1967 03:16, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete not notable Radiant! 09:22, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.