Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F-Law

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete. W.marsh 13:59, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] F-Law

F-Law (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Spammy article promoting book and its authors. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gavin.collins (talk • contribs)

• Weak delete as this, in its current form, is a poorly written borderline ad. However, it could become a meaningful article if subbed by someone with relevant knowledge. Eddie.willers 12:19, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep, but it needs editing. Goldenglove^{Contribs ·Talk} 12:53, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep and tag for cleanup. Third-party reliable sources: [1] [2] [3] [4] JulesH 13:58, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Delete it reads like an ad for the books it mentions. I due agree that it could become a relevant article if rewritten. Black Harry 15:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep and tag with {{Advert}}. — Madman bum and angel (talk – desk) 22:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep and tag for cleanup. --Djsasso 22:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Stoic atarian 22:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per the non-trivial coverage in reliable published works identified by JulesH. -- Black Falcon ^(Talk) 05:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.