Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F-5 tornado

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to Fujita scale. · Katefan0^(scribble) 22:37, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] F-5 tornado

This page seems rather unnecessary... for completion we would have to have F-0 tornado, F-1 tornado, etc... and none of those pages are weighty enough to have their own category. Also, reasons for "sudden downturn of F-5 tornadoes" can be listed under "tornado". Rob 11:51, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

• Redirect to Fujita scale. I would also support deletion. -- Plutor 14:59, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to either Fujita scale or List of F5 tornadoes - it's quite possible people would try and link to this. sjorford #£@%&$?! 19:30, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Fujita scale, and create the rest of the redirects as well. --Carnildo 23:42, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Fujita scale which describes the meaning of the term rather than a list of tornadoes. Also make redirects for names without the dashes (like F5 tornado). - Mgm|^(talk) 08:58, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• I, (My IP adress is listed) created the page. Delete it if you want. I tried to make a page for my expirimentation, but delete if you must. But it wouldn't be unnecessary to relocate internal information. But another thing I'd like to know is how do you people find this page? Why would you even click on the F-5 tornado link? Do you simply go around looking for imperfections of the smallest bit pages?
  • Comment -- It was listed under Category:Tornadoes if I recall correctly. I was doing some work in that subject. --Rob 14:27, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge/Redirect to Fujita scale. We do need the redirect for GFDL reasons. Titoxd 02:34, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Fujita scale, though I am not opposed to deletion. -- Evolauxia 00:29, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.