Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ezina LeBlanc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --Stephen 00:45, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ezina LeBlanc

Ezina LeBlanc (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

I can't find any reliable external sources. You'd think that if she was recognized internationally, there would at least be some coverage about her. All I can find is her personal webpage and her Cafepress page. Soxred93 | talk bot 01:05, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

There are more Google hits under Ezina Moore. I looked at this earlier today, the article is obviously copied from somewhere else on Wikipedia, but I can't find where. I asked the article's creator (User:Ezinam) if she had copied it from somewhere, but she hasn't replied. There need to be reliable sources, anyway. I'm withholding a !vote for now, depending on how the editor responds. Corvus cornixtalk 03:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete A lot of the material in the article just doesn't check out. Likely to be a hoax. Dgf32 (talk) 04:59, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
    1. So you can probably tell that I am new to this world of adding entries to wikipedia, but I am not new to Ezina LeBlanc (nee Ezina Moore). If you check out the pages of Miss Black USA, you will see that she is indeed listed as the recipient of that title [1]. A more thorough search will find that the other references on this page are all legit as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.139.19.133 (talk) 15:25, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Right, that's how I found out the Ezina Moore name. But I'm still withholding judgement until you explain where this article's text was copied from. Corvus cornixtalk 19:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, no response to my request for an explanation of the source, this swerves too close to a copyright violation. Corvus cornixtalk 00:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.