Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ezekiel 25:17

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete (no redirect). Bucketsofg 21:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ezekiel 25:17

Ezekiel 25:17 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article is about a single phrase from the Bible, and the only content which exists here is because of a minor piece of film trivia, which probably wouldn't be kept at Pulp Fiction. We don't need articles about every single Bible verse, and especially when the article has nothing to do with the Bible at all. Haemo 04:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

It also occurs to be that we could just redirect to Book of Ezekiel, but I don't really see why, since not every Bible verse needs a redirect. --Haemo 04:45, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. It's actually already in Pulp Fiction. —Celithemis 04:49, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect either to Book of Ezekiel or to Pulp Fiction, if only to discourage its recreation. Failing that, delete. Natalie 05:00, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

  I think it's unencyclopedic to redirect a Bible verse to a movie, but redirecting to Book of Ezekiel could be OK. —Celithemis 06:17, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - per redundancy with Pulp Fiction, which is the first place the curious would inspect for such information. Orderinchaos78 07:04, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per redundancy, with Pulp Fiction... also per the fact that we don't need an article about every single Bible verse. --Candy-Panda 12:37, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Pulp_Fiction#Jules.27_Bible_passage. Anyone looking for the real Ezekiel 25:17 is unlikely to be using Wikipedia. And as our article there gives useful links onwards for any stray biblical scholars, they should be OK. --Dweller 15:09, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment That's a pretty strong indictment of wikipedia. You may be right, but it certainly supports the conclusion that many people may have about the overall value of this project or that it cannot be taken seriously. I would redirect to the actual bible chapter, not a movie. Agent 86 20:40, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and redirect per Dweller. As others have noted, the article has nothing to do with Ezekiel as such. YechielMan 16:36, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, do not redirect.-Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 22:51, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. - grubber 19:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.