Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eye of Skadi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 02:07, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Eye of Skadi

An item from a video game, nuf said. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 09:06, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • Isn't there a policy on these somewhere? Anyway, merge or keep it, game fans might want to look it up. Kappa 09:27, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Yes, there's a policy. It's called gamecruft. Delete. Oh, and it's a custom item from a custom map for Warcraft 3. That makes it less important. Nestea 11:10, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • It's a sad day when wikipedia has a policy with a name that's inherently POV and uncivil. Kappa 12:32, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • That would make it fan fiction, which I do believe is excessively not notable. Writing an article on it is basically vanity. Delete. Radiant_* 12:13, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)
      • Actually that does make it reasonably non-notable. Wish people would say these things in their nominations. Kappa 12:26, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • "gamecruft" is a description used by some people, and not the name of a policy. We have WP:FICT, which is a semi-policy. Perhaps that was what you were thinking of. Uncle G 19:02, 2005 Apr 13 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-canonical. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:30, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete along with the rest of the DOTA articles being flooded upon us. Wikipedia is not GameFAQs. --InShaneee 19:17, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete unencyclopedic. Dave the Red (talk) 19:36, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Cruft. Unencyclopedic. Etcetera. --Bucephalus talk to me 19:56, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete nn. Who cares about the in-game items?--sometimes they change with every version of the map. (For my money, I'd rather have a Burize do Kyanon anyway.) (PS I'm new to the whole VfD thing, apologies if it's somehow not appropriate for me to comment.) Marblespire 07:56, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.