Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exo Art

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete CSD A7 not notable. Tyrenius 03:33, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Exo Art

Exo Art (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This appears to be a non-notable art phenomenon. Google provides nothing on the subject, aside from a few hits that actually aren't referring to "exo art": [1] Part Deux 22:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – Alf^Photoman 00:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, no claim of notability Alf^Photoman 00:55, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:N and WP:A it is an orphan and the only ghits found are spam and mirrors. Jeepday 01:01, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

• Comment How does it "focus on non-earth (out-of-this-world) beings?" Again, as in the "( )ette Collective," there is no mention of the art. Bus stop 01:33, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete But there are no hits on Google for an artist named Ivan Aparicio Morales so I would vote delete. Bus stop 01:40, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Borders on nonsence. Freshacconci 01:44, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. On the other side of the border of nonsense Johnbod 03:07, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.