Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exiting Worlds (Torchwood)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. @pple complain 16:28, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Exiting Worlds (Torchwood)

Exiting Worlds (Torchwood) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The article consists only of fan speculation and is completely unsourced. — Edokter • Talk • 20:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as nominator. — Edokter • Talk • 22:34, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to List of Torchwood episodes. Not even a confirmed title, and we didn't have articles on the Series 1 episodes until broadcast OZOO (What?) 20:57, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
  • If the title is not even confirmed, why redirect? — Edokter • Talk • 22:34, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
    • Because people are going to be looking for Exiting Worlds, and it makes sence to have a note indicating the possibility of it's exsistance. IIRC, that's what we did with Blink and Human Nature, among others. --OZOO (What?) 09:53, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
      • Comment Search on the terms "exiting worlds" and "torchwood": 17 results, five of which are from the English language Wikipedia. This isn't a title that's caught on with online fandom; few are likely to be looking for it. --Mark H Wilkinson ^{(t, c)} 10:03, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
      • Lookie here: a "Make your own series" speculation forum topic on freemaagyeman.com! Now at least we know where it came from. — Edokter • Talk • 12:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
        • In light of this new evidence, I change my vote to Delete --OZOO (What?) 16:48, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I can't even find pseudo-reliable sources for this title, which suggests there's little reason that people will be searching for an episode of this name. There's no rush to create episode articles like this; Wikipedia ought to be the tortoise that wins the race (ie. steady and methodical). --Mark H Wilkinson ^{(t, c)} 21:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Completely agree with Mark Wilkinson. GlassCobra 22:13, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect per OZOO. 132.205.44.5 22:27, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. If a valid source confirms this as the correct title, it can be recreated. (But without the unnecessary disambiguator.) --Brian Olsen 00:46, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 04:16, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. I dis a google search and couldn't find any source for this title. StuartDD ( t • c ) 13:21, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

I would personally say DON'T deleate. I mean, there is no longer an episode name, just infomation (which is confirmed by the way). Legs of boe 18:22, 13 September 2007 (UTC)legs_of_boe

• • Please do not move the page around during a deletion debate. — Edokter • Talk • 18:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Comment - If the information is confirmed, and you can provide a source for it, then you can put it on the List of Torchwood episodes under "Plot details". StuartDD ( t • c ) 19:41, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Comment - Can we delete this yet? This started on the 12th, and only one person says Keep. StuartDD ( t • c ) 12:45, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.