Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Excelonics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:51, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Excelonics

Delete - not even a full page of Google hits. Spam, especially the first version of the article, though it does claim that at Excelonics, the customer is indeed "number one". Nothing in the way of WP:CORP. Wickethewok 03:04, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:CORP, nn, spam, and a word-for-word copy of their website. - Fan1967 03:11, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Speedy with the good ol' CSD A7 Hobbeslover 03:12, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Question - Can you CSD A7 companies? Wickethewok 03:15, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
    • No. Fan1967 03:15, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment Okay, you got me, sorry for the improper use of A7 Hobbeslover 03:17, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
      • An argument can be made for CSD A8, based on the fact that the content is a copyright violation. Fan1967 03:23, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:CORP, spam. --Terence Ong 04:41, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete reminds me of something you'd see on CNNN. THE KING 05:43, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Fails WP:CORP -- Samir धर्म 06:00, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. - Nick C 13:54, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not Google™, Vancarlimospacecaft Avi 15:12, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• SPEEDY DELETE - db-author per blanking. Wickethewok 23:40, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.