Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ExAmour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 00:20, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ExAmour

ExAmour (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Notability has been questioned, but not been demonstrated Tikiwont 13:45, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - This article provides verifiable sources, is not spam, is Wikified, and presents information that might be useful or interesting to someone (certainly not me though). Based on that, and the fact that this is an esoteric subject, I suggest we give some benefit of the doubt regarding notability Shaundakulbara 08:21, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • No Vote - Given the comment below, I'll just bow out of this discussion as the tech-talk is over my head. Shaundakulbara 22:45, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - As results now from Talk:ExAmour, the inserted sources are not about ExAmour at all, but about and copied from the underlying Exokernel which is notable, while ExAmour as a young project in my opinion is not. Tikiwont 09:17, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.