Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ex-local authority property boom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 23:36, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ex-local authority property boom

Delete, advertisement for website. (UK editors - does this topic merit an article that isn't an ad?) FreplySpang (talk) 11:21, July 26, 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete Eclipsed 11:19, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - and no, the topic doesn't merit an article. --Andrew Norman 12:17, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete advertisement.-Poli (talk • contribs) 13:21, 2005 July 26 (UTC)
  • Delete pointless advert. The course of the property market in the UK is highly encyclopaedic but this is just a property firm ad. David | Talk 15:03, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Also note the existences of Ex-local authority property, Buy to Let ex-local authority property, and Buy to Let ex-local authority properties. This group of articles is looking like Wikipedia:spam, and may be Speedy deletable under criterion G3. Uncle G 15:51:37, 2005-07-26 (UTC)
  • Delete, its spam and anyway I live in the UK and have never heard of them. --ßjweþþ (talk) 16:19, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment The right to buy concept introduced by the Thatcher government certainly merits an article. Its probably the most important development in the UK property market in the last 40 years. CalJW 20:32, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete advertising. JamesBurns 09:17, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. The info is in Right to Buy Scheme. No-one will search under this POV title so I don't see the need for a redirect. Secretlondon 12:47, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is an advert and the idea of a current boom is POV. Right to Buy Scheme seems the right place for any genuine material. William Avery 14:38, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.