Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ewigkeit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, and it was moved to Ewigkeit (music project) Steve _(Stephen) ^talk 05:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ewigkeit

Ewigkeit (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Does this assert notability? I thought so, but on re-reading it, it looks more to assert excuses for lack of independent sources. The subject appears to be responsible for a fair chunk of the content [1] Guy (Help!) 14:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

• Keep Two albums on Earache Records meets WP:MUSIC, although it does need work on independent sourcing. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 14:30, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Another annoying article about a band with a name taken from something in the real world, and not identified as a band (if a "one man music project" is a band). I came here wondering why someone was deleting an article about the German word for "eternity," and found it was just about an experimental "extreme music" performer. This should be renamed Ewigkeit (band) or Ewigkeit (musician) if kept, to disambiguate from the actual word. No demonstration of notability. The article claims lots of "critical praise" but does not present sources satisfying WP:A to substantiate it. Edison 14:58, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete- Per no notability and not meeting WP:MUSIC. Eaomatrix 15:35, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. As Edison's remarks make clear, it is important for nominations of articles on bands with allusive names to make clear in text that the nomination is about a band. I couldn't be sure from reading the nomination alone whether this might be about some philosophical or similar notion, which may or may not be worth keeping, but is likely worth reading. - Smerdis of Tlön 19:18, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep The WP:Music policy cited above says that 2 albums on one of the more important indie labels meets the requirement. Earache is one of the more important indie labels and he has 2 albums on it. Seems simple.Fimbulwintr 21:41, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.