Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ewife

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 01:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ewife

Ewife (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Neologism. Google turns up practically nothing, but the article's existed since October 2005, so brought to AfD. eLiminatorJR eTalk 01:08, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

  • eDelete as neologism. YechielMan 03:46, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • eRase. Simply not notable. (I have it on good authority, though, that the 114th Congress will have to take up the matter of e-civil unions after a contested Supreme Court ruling.) --Dhartung | Talk 04:30, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • VERY VERY STRONG DELETE Lv100, AS INACCURATE: THERE IS NO WOMAN PLAYING MMORPG. LOL just joking, but it is obvious neologism and unattributed article. Carlosguitar 07:12, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • eDelete another eNeologisms. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 07:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • eDelete for the usual eReasons. tomasz. 09:39, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • pwn (translation:Delete) per lack of sourcing, as well as being a non-notable neologism. Cheers, Lanky (TALK) 13:52, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, if for no other reason than because people are having WAY too much fun on this deletion discussion, with all the "e-puns" and what-not. (Just kidding...seriously, though, it's a neologism, so be off with it!) --Hnsampat 15:24, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, God made Urban Dictionary for articles like this one. ~ SEEnoEVIL punch the keys 16:48, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • BOOM Headshot or in other words delete. Wildthing61476 19:56, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • eDivorce from existence as a neologism. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per eNeo —MrSomeone ( tlk • cntrb ) 23:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.