Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ewer

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge and redirect to pitcher (container). —Korath (Talk) 01:33, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ewer

Kevinbot tagged this with a speedy after transwiki-ing. The wiktionary tag was disputed, but my opinion is that this article has potential (e.g. ewer design through history [1]) and should be kept. Kappa 06:44, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• You're probably right, but how about merging it with pitcher for now? It can always be broken out if it's expanded bigger than that. Radiant_* 09:15, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
• I could live with that. Merge to pitcher. Mgm|^(talk) 10:16, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
• A Merge is a good idea, even though there's more content in this article than there is in pitcher. As per the edit history, I agree with Kappa. ☺ Uncle G 14:46, 2005 Mar 23 (UTC)
• Merge and Redirect to pitcher (container) Kevin Rector 18:13, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to pitcher (container). Interestingly, that article is also currently a mere dicdef but there is potential for expansion. Rossami (talk) 00:06, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.