Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolutions Gate

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (minus sockpuppet votes). Ingoolemo talk 23:22, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC)

[edit] Evolutions Gate

Unnotable "movement". ~30 Google hits. --Xcali 20:58, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep - It may be a small religion, but it's still a religion --El Groovy One 16:11, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) (220.245.178.135 06:12, 2005 Jun 13 according to edit history. Uncle G 11:58, 2005 Jun 13 (UTC))
  • Delete - hoax. --Ian Pitchford 21:11, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete vanity if not a hoax of some sort. Sasquatch′↔Talk↔Contributions 23:06, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
  • keep good info Chubby Chicken 00:30, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Ah, the Heavy Hen strikes again.. Recently, Chubby Chicken, has done almost nothing but cast "keep" votes on VfD - many for clearly non-notable, even borderline speedy articles. Please keep that grain of information in mind when counting votes. -- BD2412 talk 03:18, 2005 Jun 13 (UTC)
  • keep Interesting has duplicate though mystro 04:30, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) (203.221.238.254 00:57, 2005 Jun 13 according to edit history. Uncle G 01:41, 2005 Jun 13 (UTC))
  • Delete. Maybe vanity, maybe a hoax, but definitely not notable. -- BD2412 talk 03:18, 2005 Jun 13 (UTC)
  • Delete. Wholly unencyclopedic. Postdlf 03:30, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • keep good info for pro-evoloutionist Kate 00:30, 14 Jun 2005 (220.245.178.140 05:55, 2005 Jun 13 according to edit history. Uncle G 11:58, 2005 Jun 13 (UTC))
  • Delete - Nonencyclopedic. --FCYTravis 05:56, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Nonsense. Gamaliel 06:02, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete all microfaiths --Doc (?) 09:37, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • keep I think this should stay, Heavens Gate has a wiki so should Evolutions Gate, I have a strong feeling it's only the Christians who want it removed. this is not a Christian encyclopedia but a global onedarwinist 10:30, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Please do not invent motives for other editors. Gamaliel 23:19, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Actually User:61.8.5.174,[1] NOT User:darwinist (who wouldn't be able to vote anyway due to insufficient edits).[2]
Comment: Actually, the strange use of terminology, e.g., "darwinist" and "evolutionist" suggests this is a creationist hoax. --Ian Pitchford 10:23, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Either that, or it was written by very young secular humanists. Postdlf 16:23, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
You could be right, though secular humanists probably wouldn't identify with a small self-destructive cult. --Ian Pitchford 19:13, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Web site an obvious hoax. carmeld1 00:49, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. As noted by Carmeld1, it is an obvious hoax. Quale 21:35, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable, POV nonsense. --Adun 05:48, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.