Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Every Shade of Blue

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep Eluchil404 12:20, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Every Shade of Blue

non notable individual song. according to Bananarama, didn't get on top 100 in the UK, the US or Australia. Albums are generally notable for themselves, songs, not so much. Rory096 02:45, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

• Comment. I would vote to merge with the album except we don't have an article on it. The article is of a high standard and appears to have been created in response to a request through articles through creation. I don't think that this meets the standards for a standalone article in which case the policy is to merge with I have left a message for Marudubshinki the creator of the article to seek his input. Capitalistroadster 03:40, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • It seemed a reasonable request, so I fulfilled it. But if it should be mrged into an album, doesn't an obvious solution present itself which would kill two birds with one stone? --maru (talk) contribs 03:49, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Yes, it does. Capitalistroadster 06:47, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep until creation of an article on the album, then merge per above. Armedblowfish (talk|contribs) 07:11, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, until an album article is created and then merge/redirect. - Motor (talk) 09:47, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, then merge per above. -- Kicking222 12:35, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.