Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everett L Storey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete hoax. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 05:41, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Everett L Storey

Alleged inventor of a "super energized mineral concentrate". I have rescued this from speedy deletion because "Everett L Storey" scores several relevant Google hits. This may be worth recording as a mildly notable real-world hoax or charlatan product. -- RHaworth 16:13, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete The google hits all reek of press release. Delete as spam. Dipics 16:16, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete in its present form. Storey himself might be a good subject for an article focusing on his atomic era research, but if this cellfood was real and verifiable, it'd be to radiation poisoning what penicilin was to infections: widely recognized and used. Akradecki 16:28, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:V for starters (I have more ...) WilyD 17:37, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Lincolnite 17:57, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a minor (and ultimately nn) pseudoscientific hoax. "Freedom Deuterium act" gets zero Google hits, and "Deuterium Freedom act" only turns up copies of Cellfood press releases. Zetawoof^(ζ) 20:34, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - blatant hoax, and not silly enough to win my praise. My Alt Account 01:07, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete speedily and block from recreation - this is the third time this article has been created. Advertising/hoax/spam - either way it's a waste of time to go through all this. --ArmadilloFromHell 19:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Note: General discussion has been moved to the talk page to keep this uncluttered. Akradecki 02:19, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, good idea! That helped a lot. My Alt Account 02:25, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.